Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
52
BIRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$41.07
Seasonality move
:
-11.06%
Day range:
$40.88 - $46.27
52-week range:
$38.16 - $62.66
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
19.72x
P/S ratio:
3.30x
P/B ratio:
2.36x
Volume:
10.5M
Avg. volume:
2.3M
1-year change:
-28.03%
Market cap:
$7.6B
Revenue:
$2.3B
EPS (TTM):
$2.09
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding Plc
|
$612.5M | $0.42 | 22.64% | 143.16% | $63.33 |
|
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
|
$961.5M | $2.36 | -7.44% | -70.03% | $89.75 |
|
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
|
$1.4B | $1.58 | 2.16% | -8% | $111.97 |
|
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
|
$12.2B | $0.38 | 1.07% | -12.31% | $83.07 |
|
RCKY
Rocky Brands, Inc.
|
$122.9M | $0.90 | 4.68% | -24.35% | $40.00 |
|
SHOO
Steven Madden Ltd.
|
$694.2M | $0.45 | 30.52% | -3.64% | $45.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding Plc
|
$41.14 | $63.33 | $7.6B | 19.72x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.30x |
|
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
|
$89.46 | $89.75 | $4.6B | 29.17x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.23x |
|
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
|
$100.55 | $111.97 | $14.7B | 14.91x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.89x |
|
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
|
$65.69 | $83.07 | $97.1B | 33.67x | $0.41 | 2.45% | 2.09x |
|
RCKY
Rocky Brands, Inc.
|
$30.75 | $40.00 | $230.4M | 11.23x | $0.16 | 2.02% | 0.49x |
|
SHOO
Steven Madden Ltd.
|
$42.89 | $45.50 | $3.1B | 54.47x | $0.21 | 1.96% | 1.29x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding Plc
|
32.95% | -0.146 | 18.89% | 1.07x |
|
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
|
55.58% | -0.388 | 38.99% | 0.76x |
|
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
|
12.45% | 0.583 | 2.37% | 2.11x |
|
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
|
45.09% | 2.010 | 10.2% | 1.24x |
|
RCKY
Rocky Brands, Inc.
|
36.46% | 1.078 | 63.31% | 0.83x |
|
SHOO
Steven Madden Ltd.
|
38.84% | 2.833 | 21.89% | 0.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding Plc
|
$335M | $135.3M | 8.54% | 12.88% | 22% | $145M |
|
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
|
$583M | $207.7M | 5.33% | 10.98% | 20.84% | $226.2M |
|
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
|
$775.6M | $318.6M | 36.91% | 41.28% | 22.39% | -$13.9M |
|
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
|
$4.9B | $884M | 11.41% | 21.08% | 7.54% | $15M |
|
RCKY
Rocky Brands, Inc.
|
$49.3M | $11.7M | 5.46% | 8.7% | 9.58% | -$5.2M |
|
SHOO
Steven Madden Ltd.
|
$266.2M | $31.4M | 5.22% | 7.08% | 4.7% | $8.6M |
Birkenstock Holding Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BIRK or CROX?
Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Birkenstock Holding Plc's net margin of 14.64%. Birkenstock Holding Plc's return on equity of 12.88% beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc54.47% $0.60 $4.8B CROXCrocs, Inc.58.52% $2.70 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BIRK or CROX?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a consensus price target of $63.33, signalling upside risk potential of 62%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.75 which suggests that it could grow by 0.32%. Given that Birkenstock Holding Plc has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Birkenstock Holding Plc is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc16 3 0 CROXCrocs, Inc.4 8 1 -
Is BIRK or CROX More Risky?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIRK or CROX?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Birkenstock Holding Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIRK or CROX?
Birkenstock Holding Plc quarterly revenues are $615.1M, which are smaller than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Birkenstock Holding Plc's net income of $109.7M is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Birkenstock Holding Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birkenstock Holding Plc is 3.30x versus 1.23x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc3.30x 19.72x $615.1M $109.7M CROXCrocs, Inc.1.23x 29.17x $996.3M $145.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIRK or DECK?
Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Birkenstock Holding Plc's net margin of 18.85%. Birkenstock Holding Plc's return on equity of 12.88% beat Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s return on equity of 41.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc54.47% $0.60 $4.8B DECKDeckers Outdoor Corp.54.51% $1.82 $2.8B -
What do Analysts Say About BIRK or DECK?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a consensus price target of $63.33, signalling upside risk potential of 62%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $111.97 which suggests that it could grow by 11.36%. Given that Birkenstock Holding Plc has higher upside potential than Deckers Outdoor Corp., analysts believe Birkenstock Holding Plc is more attractive than Deckers Outdoor Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc16 3 0 DECKDeckers Outdoor Corp.9 12 1 -
Is BIRK or DECK More Risky?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.76%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIRK or DECK?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deckers Outdoor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Birkenstock Holding Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIRK or DECK?
Birkenstock Holding Plc quarterly revenues are $615.1M, which are smaller than Deckers Outdoor Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Birkenstock Holding Plc's net income of $109.7M is lower than Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s net income of $268.2M. Notably, Birkenstock Holding Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birkenstock Holding Plc is 3.30x versus 2.89x for Deckers Outdoor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc3.30x 19.72x $615.1M $109.7M DECKDeckers Outdoor Corp.2.89x 14.91x $1.4B $268.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIRK or NKE?
NIKE, Inc. has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Birkenstock Holding Plc's net margin of 6.2%. Birkenstock Holding Plc's return on equity of 12.88% beat NIKE, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc54.47% $0.60 $4.8B NKENIKE, Inc.41.78% $0.49 $24.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BIRK or NKE?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a consensus price target of $63.33, signalling upside risk potential of 62%. On the other hand NIKE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.07 which suggests that it could grow by 26.46%. Given that Birkenstock Holding Plc has higher upside potential than NIKE, Inc., analysts believe Birkenstock Holding Plc is more attractive than NIKE, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc16 3 0 NKENIKE, Inc.20 12 1 -
Is BIRK or NKE More Risky?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIKE, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIRK or NKE?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIKE, Inc. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Birkenstock Holding Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc. pays out 72.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIRK or NKE?
Birkenstock Holding Plc quarterly revenues are $615.1M, which are smaller than NIKE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Birkenstock Holding Plc's net income of $109.7M is lower than NIKE, Inc.'s net income of $727M. Notably, Birkenstock Holding Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while NIKE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birkenstock Holding Plc is 3.30x versus 2.09x for NIKE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc3.30x 19.72x $615.1M $109.7M NKENIKE, Inc.2.09x 33.67x $11.7B $727M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIRK or RCKY?
Rocky Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Birkenstock Holding Plc's net margin of 5.89%. Birkenstock Holding Plc's return on equity of 12.88% beat Rocky Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc54.47% $0.60 $4.8B RCKYRocky Brands, Inc.40.21% $0.96 $387.3M -
What do Analysts Say About BIRK or RCKY?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a consensus price target of $63.33, signalling upside risk potential of 62%. On the other hand Rocky Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.59%. Given that Birkenstock Holding Plc has higher upside potential than Rocky Brands, Inc., analysts believe Birkenstock Holding Plc is more attractive than Rocky Brands, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc16 3 0 RCKYRocky Brands, Inc.1 1 0 -
Is BIRK or RCKY More Risky?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocky Brands, Inc. has a beta of 2.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.898%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIRK or RCKY?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocky Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Birkenstock Holding Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Brands, Inc. pays out 40.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIRK or RCKY?
Birkenstock Holding Plc quarterly revenues are $615.1M, which are larger than Rocky Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $122.5M. Birkenstock Holding Plc's net income of $109.7M is higher than Rocky Brands, Inc.'s net income of $7.2M. Notably, Birkenstock Holding Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while Rocky Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birkenstock Holding Plc is 3.30x versus 0.49x for Rocky Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc3.30x 19.72x $615.1M $109.7M RCKYRocky Brands, Inc.0.49x 11.23x $122.5M $7.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIRK or SHOO?
Steven Madden Ltd. has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Birkenstock Holding Plc's net margin of 3.27%. Birkenstock Holding Plc's return on equity of 12.88% beat Steven Madden Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc54.47% $0.60 $4.8B SHOOSteven Madden Ltd.39.86% $0.29 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About BIRK or SHOO?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a consensus price target of $63.33, signalling upside risk potential of 62%. On the other hand Steven Madden Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 6.09%. Given that Birkenstock Holding Plc has higher upside potential than Steven Madden Ltd., analysts believe Birkenstock Holding Plc is more attractive than Steven Madden Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc16 3 0 SHOOSteven Madden Ltd.4 3 0 -
Is BIRK or SHOO More Risky?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden Ltd. has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.552%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIRK or SHOO?
Birkenstock Holding Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steven Madden Ltd. offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Birkenstock Holding Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden Ltd. pays out 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIRK or SHOO?
Birkenstock Holding Plc quarterly revenues are $615.1M, which are smaller than Steven Madden Ltd. quarterly revenues of $667.9M. Birkenstock Holding Plc's net income of $109.7M is higher than Steven Madden Ltd.'s net income of $21.8M. Notably, Birkenstock Holding Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.72x while Steven Madden Ltd.'s PE ratio is 54.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birkenstock Holding Plc is 3.30x versus 1.29x for Steven Madden Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIRKBirkenstock Holding Plc3.30x 19.72x $615.1M $109.7M SHOOSteven Madden Ltd.1.29x 54.47x $667.9M $21.8M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
36
INSP alert for Dec 19
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. [INSP] is down 19.66% over the past day.
Sell
40
INSM alert for Dec 19
Insmed, Inc. [INSM] is down 16.08% over the past day.
Buy
52
BIRK alert for Dec 19
Birkenstock Holding Plc [BIRK] is down 11.49% over the past day.
